ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To understand the drug resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN) isolate resistance to 18 kinds of antibacterials which included imipenem and meropenem. METHODS We detected 36 kinds of drug resistance genes for the strain of KPN by PCR method,included the beta-lactamases genes,blaTEM,blaSHV,blaLEN,blaOKP,(blaCTX-M-1,2 and 9) groups,(blaOXA-1,2 and 10) groups,CARB,PER,VEB and GES; the genes of metallo-beta-lactamases genes,IMP,VIM and KPC; the AmpC genes,DHA,ACT,MOX and LAT; the aminoglycosides resistant genes,aac(3)-Ⅰ,aac(3)-Ⅱ,aac(6')-Ⅰb,aac(6')-Ⅱ,ant(2″)-Ⅰ and ant(3″)-Ⅰ; the quinolones resistant gene qnr; the TMP resistant genes,dfrA1 and dfrA17; the disinfectant-sulfanilamide resistantgene,qacE△1-sul1;the integron genes,intⅠ-1,intⅠ-2 and intⅠ-3; and the transposon genes,tnpA and merA.RESULTS We found 9 kinds of drug resistance genes in this KPN isolate. They were the beta-lactamases genes,blaTEM and blaSHV; the metallo-beta-lactamasesgene blaKPC-2; the aminoglycosides resistant genes,aac(3)-Ⅱ and ant(3″)-Ⅰ; the quinolones resistant gene qnr; the TMP resistant gene dfrA17; the disinfectant-sulfanilamide resistant gene qacE△1-sul1 and the integron genes intⅠ-1. CONCLUSIONS We discovere multiple drug resistant genes (some in the chromosome,some are plasmid-mediated) in this isolate. We also find the infrequent plasmid-mediated drug resistant gene blaKPC-2. We think it's concerned with the pan-resistant and the multi-drug resistant genes in this KPN,and we must pay highly attention to this isolate in clinic.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To analyze the homology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae(KPN),offering help for clinical therapy and nosocomial infection control.METHODS The antimicrobial-resistant phenotype of forty carbapenem-resistant K.pneumoniae strains was analyzed by the WHONET 5.4 soft and the resistant genotypes were determined by plasmid profile analysis and pulse-field gel electrophoresis(PFGE).RESULTS Analyzing antimicrobial-resistant phenotype to usual eighteen clinical drugs,the main drug resistant profiles were pan-resistant and only sensitive to tobramycin among the eight antimicrobial-resistant profiles(72.5%).Additionally,the main strains were type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ among the five strains analyzed by plasmid profile(82.5%).When analyzed by PFGE,five types were identified and among these strains type Ⅰ was predominant in 34 strains(85.0%).CONCLUSIONS The strains used in this study exhibit higher homology.Therefore,clinical departments and nosocomial infection departments should pay more attention to these strains to avoid outbreak.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To investigate the value of screening hospital urinary tract infection with UF-100 automated urine analyzer. METHODS It was to count the bacteria and white blood cells in 422 urine specimens with UF-100 as well as to culture the specimens quantitatively.Then the sensitivity and specificity of UF-100 counts and the correspondence of the two methods were evaluated with Yerushalmy mode. RESULTS Compared with the culture results,UF-100 showed a sensitivity of 81.5%,specificity of 63.9%,positive predictive value of 29.1%,negative predictive value of 95.0%,false positive rate of 30.5%,false negative rate of 2.8% and an accuracy of 67.2%. CONCLUSIONS The UF-100 is excellent in analyzing urine specimens,and its bacteria counts can be a valuable indicator in screening hospital urinary tract infection.